'Door-to-prophylaxis' as a novel quality improvement metric in prevention of venous thromboembolism following traumatic injury.

Objective: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk reduction strategies include early initiation of chemoprophylaxis, reducing missed doses, weight-based dosing and dose adjustment using anti-Xa levels. We hypothesized that time to initiation of chemoprophylaxis would be the strongest modifiable risk for VTE, even after adjusting for competing risk factors. Methods: A prospectively maintained trauma registry was queried for patients admitted July 2017-October 2021 who were 18 years and older and received emergency release blood products. Patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (VTE) were compared to those without (no VTE). Door-to-prophylaxis was defined as time from hospital arrival to first dose of VTE chemoprophylaxis (hours). Univariate and multivariate analyses were then performed between the two groups. Results: 2047 patients met inclusion (106 VTE, 1941 no VTE). There were no differences in baseline or demographic data. VTE patients had higher injury severity score (29 vs 24), more evidence of shock by arrival lactate (4.6 vs 3.9) and received more post-ED transfusions (8 vs 2 units); all p<0.05. While there was no difference in need for enoxaparin dose adjustment or missed doses, door-to-prophylaxis time was longer in the VTE group (35 vs 25 hours; p=0.009). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, every hour delay from time of arrival increased likelihood of VTE by 1.5% (OR 1.015, 95% CI 1.004 to 1.023, p=0.004). Conclusion: The current retrospective study of severely injured patients with trauma who required emergency release blood products found that increased door-to-prophylaxis time was significantly associated with an increased likelihood for VTE. Chemoprophylaxis initiation is one of the few modifiable risk factors available to combat VTE, therefore early initiation is paramount. Similar to door-to-balloon time in treating myocardial infarction and door-to-tPA time in stroke, "door-to-prophylaxis time" should be considered as a hospital metric for prevention of VTE in trauma. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective study with up to two negative criteria.

Resuscitation and Care in the Trauma Bay.

Start balanced resuscitation early (pre-hospital if possible), either in the form of whole blood or 1:1:1 ratio. Minimize resuscitation with crystalloid to minimize patient morbidity and mortality. Trauma-induced coagulopathy can be largely avoided with the use of balanced resuscitation, permissive hypotension, and minimized time to hemostasis. Using protocolized "triggers" for massive and ultramassive transfusion will assist in minimizing delays in transfusion of products, achieving balanced ratios, and avoiding trauma induced coagulopathy. Once "audible" bleeding has been addressed, further blood product resuscitation and adjunct replacement should be guided by viscoelastic testing. Early transfusion of whole blood can reduce patient morbidity, mortality, decreases donor exposure, and reduces nursing logistics during transfusions. Adjuncts to resuscitation should be guided by laboratory testing and carefully developed, institution-specific guidelines. These include empiric calcium replacement, tranexamic acid (or other anti-fibrinolytics), and fibrinogen supplementation.

Use of Low-Titer O-Positive Whole Blood in Female Trauma Patients: A Literature Review, Qualitative Multidisciplinary Analysis of Risk/Benefit, and Guidelines for Its Use as a Universal Product in Hemorrhagic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Whole blood transfusion is associated with benefits including improved survival, coagulopathy, and decreased transfusion requirements. The majority of whole blood transfusion is in the form of low-titer O-positive whole blood (LTOWB). Practice at many trauma centers withholds the use of LTOWB in women of childbearing potential due to concerns of alloimmunization. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence for LTOWB transfusion in female trauma patients and generate guidelines for its application. STUDY DESIGN: Literature and evidence for LTOWB transfusion in hemorrhagic shock are reviewed. The rates of alloimmunization and subsequent obstetrical outcomes are compared to the reported outcomes of LTOWB vs other resuscitation media. Literature regarding patient experiences and preferences in regards to the risk of alloimmunization is compared to current trauma practices. RESULTS: LTOWB has shown improved outcomes in both military and civilian settings. The overall risk of alloimmunization for Rhesus factor (Rh) - female patients in hemorrhagic shock exposed to Rh + blood is low (3% to 20%). Fetal outcomes in Rh-sensitized patients are excellent compared to historical standards, and treatment options continue to expand. The majority of female patients surveyed on the risk of alloimmunization favor receiving Rh + blood products to improve trauma outcomes. Obstetrical transfusion practices have incorporated LTOWB with excellent results. CONCLUSIONS: The use of whole blood resuscitation in trauma is associated with benefits in the resuscitation of severely injured patients. The rate at which severely injured, Rh-negative patients develop anti-D antibodies is low. Treatments for alloimmunized pregnancies have advanced, with excellent results. Fears of alloimmunization in female patients are likely overstated and may not warrant the withholding of whole blood resuscitation. The benefits of whole blood resuscitation likely outweigh the risks of alloimmunization.

Empiric Cryoprecipitate Transfusion in Patients with Severe Hemorrhage: Results from the US Experience in the International CRYOSTAT-2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Hypofibrinogenemia has been shown to predict massive transfusion and is associated with higher mortality in severely injured patients. However, the role of empiric fibrinogen replacement in bleeding trauma patients remains controversial. We sought to determine the effect of empiric cryoprecipitate as an adjunct to a balanced transfusion strategy (1:1:1). STUDY DESIGN: This study is a subanalysis of patients treated at the single US trauma center in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trauma patients (more than 15 years) were eligible if they had evidence of active hemorrhage requiring emergent surgery or interventional radiology, massive transfusion protocol (MTP) activation, and received at least 1 unit of blood. Transfer patients, those with injuries incompatible with life, or those injured more than 3 hours earlier were excluded. Patients were randomized to standard MTP (STANDARD) or MTP plus 3 pools of cryoprecipitate (CRYO). Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality at 28 days. Secondary outcomes were transfusion requirements, intraoperative and postoperative coagulation laboratory values, and quality-of-life measures (Glasgow outcome score-extended). RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (23 in the CRYO group and 26 in the STANDARD group) were enrolled between May 2021 and October 2021. Time to randomization was similar between groups (14 vs 24 minutes, p = 0.676). Median time to cryoprecipitate was 41 minutes (interquartile range 37 to 48). There were no differences in demographics, arrival physiology, laboratory values, or injury severity. Intraoperative and ICU thrombelastography values, including functional fibrinogen, were similar between groups. There was no benefit to CRYO with respect to post-emergency department transfusions (intraoperative and ICU through 24 hours), complications, Glasgow outcome score, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of severely injured, bleeding trauma patients, empiric cryoprecipitate did not improve survival or reduce transfusion requirements. Cryoprecipitate should continue as an "on-demand" addition to a balanced transfusion strategy, guided by laboratory values and should not be given empirically.

The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated: An evaluation of futility cut points in massive transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Following COVID and the subsequent blood shortage, several investigators evaluated futility cut points in massive transfusion. We hypothesized that early aggressive use of damage-control resuscitation, including whole blood (WB), would demonstrate that these cut points of futility were significantly underestimating potential survival among patients receiving >50 U of blood in the first 4 hours. METHODS: Adult trauma patients admitted from November 2017 to October 2021 who received emergency-release blood products in prehospital or emergency department setting were included. Deaths within 30 minutes of arrival were excluded. Total blood products were defined as total red blood cell, plasma, and WB in the field and in the first 4 hours after arrival. Patients were first divided into those receiving ≤50 or >50 U of blood in the first 4 hours. We then evaluated patients by whether they received any WB or received only component therapy. Thirty-day survival was evaluated for all included patients. RESULTS: A total of 2,299 patients met the inclusion criteria (2,043 in ≤50 U, 256 in >50 U groups). While there were no differences in age or sex, the >50 U group was more likely to sustain penetrating injury (47% vs. 30%, p < 0.05). Patients receiving >50 U of blood had lower field and arrival blood pressure and larger prehospital and emergency department resuscitation volumes ( p < 0.05). Patients in the >50 U group had lower survival than those in the ≤50 cohort (31% vs. 79%; p < 0.05). Patients who received WB (n = 1,291) had 43% increased odds of survival compared with those who received only component therapy (n = 1,008) (1.09-1.87, p = 0.009) and higher 30-day survival at transfusion volumes >50 U. CONCLUSION: Patient survival rates in patients receiving >50 U of blood in the first 4 hours of care are as high as 50% to 60%, with survival still at 15% to 25% after 100 U. While responsible blood stewardship is critical, futility should not be declared based on high transfusion volumes alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Predicting Futility in Severely Injured Patients: Using Arrival Lab Values and Physiology to Support Evidence-Based Resource Stewardship.

BACKGROUND: The recent pandemic exposed a largely unrecognized threat to medical resources, including daily available blood products. Some of the most severely injured patients who arrive in extremis consume tremendous resources yet succumb shortly after arrival. We sought to identify cut points available early in the patient's resuscitation that predicted 100% mortality. STUDY DESIGN: Cut points were developed from a previously collected data set of all level 1 trauma patients admitted January 2010 to December 2016. Objective values available on or shortly after arrival were evaluated. Once generated, we then validated these variables against (1) a prospective data set November 2017 to October 2021 of severely injured patients and (2) a multicenter, randomized trial of hemorrhagic shock patients. Analyses were conducted using STATA 17.0 (College Station, TX), generating positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: The development data set consisted of 9,509 patients (17% mortality), with 2,137 (24%) and 680 (24%) in the two validation data sets. Several combinations of arrival vitals and labs had 100% PPV. Patients undergoing CPR in the field or on arrival (with subsequent return of spontaneous circulation) required lower fibrinolysis LY-30 (30%) than those with systolic blood pressures of ≤50 (30 to 50%), ≤70 (80 to 90%), and ≤90 mmHg (90%). Using a combination of these validated variables, the Suspension of Transfusions and Other Procedures (STOP) criteria were developed, with each element predicting 100% mortality, allowing physicians to cease further resuscitative efforts. CONCLUSIONS: The use of evidence-based STOP criteria provides cut points of futility to help guide early decisions for discontinuing aggressive treatment of severely injured patients arriving in extremis.

Is the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories after bowel anastomosis in trauma safe?

BACKGROUND: With an increasing interest in multimodal and opioid-reducing pain strategies, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have become common place in the care of injured patients. Long-standing concerns of increased anastomotic leak (AL) rate with the use of NSAIDs, however, have persisted. We hypothesized that there would be no significant risk associated with NSAID use after bowel anastomosis in trauma patients. METHODS: All patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center who required intestinal resection and anastomosis from 2011 to 2017 were reviewed. Patients receiving NSAIDs were compared with those managed without NSAIDs. Primary outcome of interest was anastomosis-related complications (AL, intra-abdominal abscess, anastomotic bleed, fascial dehiscence, fascial dehiscence, and enterocutaneous fistula). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed with propensity adjustment for inverse probability of NSAID treatment weights. RESULTS: A total of 295 patients met the inclusion criteria with 192 receiving NSAIDs. Patients receiving NSAIDs had lower abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score ( p < 0.046). Arrival systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and Glasgow Coma Scale were higher in the NSAID group ( p < 0.013). After propensity weighting, NSAID use was not a major predictor of anastomotic complication ( p = 0.39). There was an increased risk of AL with perioperative vasopressor exposure (odds ratio [OR], 3.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-9.05; p < 0.001). Increasing red blood cell transfusions in the first 24 hours were associated with intra-abdominal complications (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04; p = 0.05). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exposure demonstrated a weak association with AL (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.97-3.90; p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Consistent with previous studies, perioperative vasopressor exposure and increased number of red blood cell transfusions are risk factors for ALs and intra-abdominal complications, respectively. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in trauma patients with multiple risk factors may be associated with an increased risk of AL and should be used with caution in the setting of other established risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Penetrating renal injuries: an observational study of non-operative management and the impact of opening Gerota's fascia.

BACKGROUND: Non-operative management has become increasingly popular in the treatment of renal trauma. While data are robust in blunt mechanisms, the role of non-operative management in penetrating trauma is less clear. Additionally, there is a paucity of data comparing gunshot and stab wounds. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients admitted to a high-volume level 1 trauma center (Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town) with penetrating abdominal trauma was performed. Patients with renal injuries were identified and compared based on mechanism [gunshot (GSW) vs. stab] and management strategy (operative vs. non-operative). Primary outcomes of interest were mortality and failure of non-operative management. Secondary outcomes of interest were nephrectomy rates, Clavien-Dindo complication rate, hospital length of stay, and overall morbidity rate. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients with renal injuries were identified (82 GSW, 68 stab). Overall, 55.2% of patients required emergent/urgent laparotomy. GSWs were more likely to cause grade V injury and concurrent intra-abdominal injuries (p > 0.05). The success rate of non-operative management was 91.6% (89.9% GSW, 92.8% stab, p = 0.64). The absence of hematuria on point of care testing demonstrated a negative predictive value of 98.4% (95% CI 96.8-99.2%). All but 1 patient who failed non-operative management had associated intra-abdominal injuries requiring surgical intervention. Opening of Gerota's fascia resulted in nephrectomy in 55.6% of cases. There were no statistically significant risk factors for failure of non-operative management identified on univariate logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: NOM of penetrating renal injuries can be safely and effectively instituted in both gunshot and stab wounds with a very low number of patients progressing to laparotomy. Most patients fail NOM for associated injuries. During laparotomy, the opening of Gerota's fascia may lead to increased risk of nephrectomy. Ongoing study with larger populations is required to develop effective predictive models of patients who will fail NOM.

Is the Pringle manoeuvre becoming a lost art? Contemporary use for both severe liver trauma with ongoing hemorrhage and elective partial hepatectomy.

The Pringle manoeuvre (vascular inflow occlusion) has been a mainstay technique in trauma surgery and hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery since it was first described in the early 1900s. We sought to determine how frequently the manoeuvre is used today for both elective and emergent cases in these disciplines. To reflect on its evolution, we evaluated the Pringle manoeuvre over a recent 10-year period (2010-2020). We found it is used less frequently owing to more frequent nonoperative management and more advanced elective hepatic resection techniques. Continuing educational collaboration is critical to ensure continued insight into the impact of hepatic vascular inflow occlusion among trainees who observe this procedure less frequently.

OPTICC: A multicentre trial of Occult Pneumothoraces subjected to mechanical ventilation: The final report.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with occult pneumothorax (OPTX) requiring positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) face uncertain risks of tension pneumothorax or chest drainage complications. METHODS: Adults with traumatic OPTXs requiring PPV were randomized to drainage/observation, with the primary outcome of composite "respiratory distress" (RD)). RESULTS: Seventy-five (75) patients were randomized to observation, 67 to drainage. RD occurred in 38% observed and 25% drained (p = 0.14; Power = 0.38), with no mortality differences. One-quarter of observed patients failed, reaching 40% when ventilated >5 days. Twenty-three percent randomized to drainage had complications or ineffectual drains. CONCLUSION: RD was not significantly different with observation. Thus, OPTXs may be cautiously observed in stable patients undergoing short-term PPV when prompt "rescue drainage" is immediately available. As 40% of patients undergoing prolonged (≥5 days) ventilation (PPPV) require drainage, we suggest consideration of chest drainage performed with expert guidance to reduce risk of chest tube complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level II.

A Saline/Bipolar Radiofrequency Energy Device As an Adjunct for Hemostasis in Solid Organ Injury/Trauma.

Solid organ (liver, spleen, and kidney) hemorrhage is often life-threatening and can be difficult to stop in critically ill patients. Traditional techniques for arresting this ongoing bleeding include coagulation by high voltage electrocautery, topical hemostatic application, and the delivery of ignited argon gas. The goal of this study/video was to demonstrate the efficacy of a new energy device for arresting persistent solid organ hemorrhage.A novel instrument utilizing bipolar radiofrequency (RF) energy which acts to ignite/boil dripping saline from a simple handpiece is employed to arrest ongoing bleeding from solid organ injuries in a porcine model. This instrument is extrapolated from experience within elective hepatic resections. An escalating series of injuries to solid organs within a porcine model will be created. This will be followed by arresting hemorrhage with this novel energy device in sequence. A standard suction device will also be employed. This simple saline/RF energy instrument has the potential to arrest ongoing solid organ surface/capsular bleeding, as well as moderate hemorrhage associated with deep lacerations.

Synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a national survey of surgeon opinions on simultaneous resection and multidisciplinary cooperation.

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (sCRLM) has evolved significantly (improved chemotherapy, hepatic surgery advancements, colonic stenting, consultation synergies). We sought to better understand surgeon viewpoints on optimal referral patterns and the delivery of simultaneous resections. METHODS: A 40 question on-line survey was offered to members of the Canadian surgical community. Statistical analysis was descriptive. RESULTS: A total of 52 surgeons responded. Most colorectal surgeons (CRS) had access to and a good working relationship with regional hepatobiliary (HPB) surgeons (86%) and medical oncologists (100%). The majority (92%) believed there was a role for simultaneous resection of sCRLM, with 69% having first hand experience. Many CRS (62%) discussed all cases of known hepatic metastases with HPB prior to any resection. When a lesion was asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic, most CRS (92%) discussed them with medical oncology/HPB prior to resection (8%). Bilobar metastases (58%), patient comorbidities (35%), portal lymphadenopathy (35%), and patient age (15%) restricted CRS from obtaining HPB consultations. Many CRS (46%) did not believe that resecting hepatic metastases prior to the primary lesion might be beneficial. Most CRS (60%) reported they could not accurately predict hepatic resectability, with only 27% familiarity with evidence-based guidelines. Despite working in smaller hospitals with less access to HPB and less experience with simultaneous resections, non-CR general surgeons more commonly supported a 'liver-first' approach. CONCLUSIONS: There was general agreement between CRS and general surgeons on numerous topics, but additional education is required with regard to HPB surgical capabilities and to provide truly individualized patient-centered care.

Neurocognitive assessment in patients with a minor traumatic brain injury and an abnormal initial CT scan: Can cognitive evaluation assist in identifying patients who require surveillance CT brain imaging?

BACKGROUND: Evidence for repeat computed tomography (CT) in minor traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients with intracranial pathology is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of clinical cognitive assessment (COG) in defining the need for repeat imaging. METHODS: COG performance was compared with findings on subsequent CT, and need for neurosurgery in mTBI patients (GCS 13-15 and positive CT findings). RESULTS: Of 152 patients, 65.8% received a COG (53.0% passed). Patients with passed COG underwent fewer repeat CT (43.4% vs. 78.7%; p = .001) and had shorter LOS (8.7 vs. 19.5; p < .05). Only 1 patient required neurosurgery after a passed COG. The negative predictive value of a normal COG was 90.6% (95%CI = 81.8%-95.4%). CONCLUSION: mTBI patients with an abnormal index CT who pass COG are less likely to undergo repeat CT head, and rarely require neurosurgery. The COG warrants further investigation to determine its role in omitting repeat head CT.

Does increased prehospital time lead to a "trial of life" effect for patients with blunt trauma?

BACKGROUND: Variance in prehospital time among severely injured blunt trauma patients is dependent upon numerous factors. Effects on subsequent mortality and trauma team activation (TTA) rates are also unclear. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between prehospital time and mortality at level I trauma referral centers amongst critically blunt injured patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multiinstitutional study from three geographically distinct level I trauma centers analyzed all severely blunt injured patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥12). The relationship between prehospital time and survival was evaluated. Secondary outcomes included the association between prehospital time and TTA. Standard statistical methodology was used (P < 0.05 = significance). RESULTS: Between January 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016, 5375 severely blunt injured patients (mean ISS = 25; mean length of stay = 16.3 d) were analyzed (center 1 = 3376; center 2 = 2401; and center 3 = 1104). As prehospital time interval increased, overall mortality decreased (0-30 min = 24.1%; 31-60 min = 14.7%; 61-90 min = 10.3%; 91-120 min = 10.4%; 121-150 min = 10.2%; P < 0.05). This pattern was especially strong for patients with an arrival measurement of hypotension, despite corrections for ISS (P < 0.05). TTA and patient outcomes were extremely variable across intervals and centers (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A trial of life effect is present for severely blunt injured patients who arrive with vital signs. Despite arrival measurements of hypotension, patients with prolonged prehospital times have a substantially lower risk of subsequent mortality. This concept should contribute to decision-making with regard to TTA.